Intelligent natural selection or imaginary evolution
To explain the shapes, we give an example of genetic similarity. We all know that in building a building or industrial project, the building plan or project plays a key role, that is, if you want to build a building with certain appearance and interior features, you must consider all these features in the map. Now, if you want to build this building in some parts of the world, there will be no difference in the appearance and inside of this building, even though its architect and construction forces are different people. And whoever visits one of these buildings, It is as if he has visited all those buildings. And so no one can claim that the builder of these two buildings was a special person, because they are very similar. The same can be true of the human genome and other organisms, because the genome in the body of organisms is a map in other projects. That is, if you have a creature with the physical and external characteristics of a human, its genome must be similar to the genome of a Neanderthal human. And that slight difference in the genomes of modern humans and Neanderthals can be related to the spiritual differences between the two species.
Of course, I emphasize again that defending these two scenarios does not mean one hundred percent approval or rejection of these two scenarios.
3- The origin of all beings and human beings started from a living being, who also started his creation from soil. But God has given a privilege to modern man and has given him the characteristics of a modern human being such as intellect, science, tact, eloquence and so on. ..These differences in our genome is the same as three tenths of a percent genetic difference with Neanderthals, which perhaps God means by saying: We breathed our souls into humans, the fertilization of these genes to modern humans that caused these traits in humans Has been.
The first scenario is because there is a lot of scientific evidence against him now and it is not intellectually necessary for God to consider a separate creation for each creature. Therefore, this scenario may not be very valid.
The second scenario has a lot of fans. Because it scientifically confirms the intelligent natural selection. Considering the huge difference between man and other beings, God raises the direct intervention in the immediate creation of man, which is also acceptable to the monotheists.
But I prefer the third option, considering the many names mentioned for the origin of man’s creation in the Holy Qur’an, and other reasons that I mention. However, many may not accept my opinion.Scholars such as Ayatollah Meshkini have also defended the theory of evolution. And people like Ayatollah Sobhani and Makarem Shirazi have not rejected it. And the great contemporary commentator of the Qur’an, Ayatollah Tabatabai, does not deny the evolution of beings, but says about man: The appearance of the Qur’an does not confirm the evolution of man. Of course, he also explicitly states that the appearance of the Qur’an is what we see superficially
