Intelligent natural selection or imaginary evolution
There is a proverb that says: a person does not pass through the garage door once, but once through a hole a needle passes. Friends who believe in random natural selection do not see all this scientific and rational evidence and deny the existence of the Creator. But instead, if a few amino acids are produced in a laboratory as a result of interactions (Miller Experiment – Bury 1953), and immediately believed in accidental creation and strongly defended it.
While, as we said: We also believe that God created creation through the law of cause and effect and based on scientific laws, but we must tell these friends: where is the production of several amino acids and the creation of composite and at the top of it intelligent man
Before entering into the second discussion, it seems necessary to mention a few points.
First, friends, if they see the reason for their opposition to the Creator, the mention of contradictory scientific contents in the heavenly books. It is better to limit their opposition to those books, not the Creator.
Second, when we are going to defend a scientific hypothesis (not a scientific principle), it is better to do some research on the side issues of that theory to make sure that it is true, to be more sure. In the case of the theory of random natural selection, in fact, we deny everything immaterial, and we deny spirituality altogether .
Please look around to see if this is the case. Do those who believe in spiritual matters all think you have schizophrenia? Has metaphysics, true dreams, oral traditions in different religions and places of worship, telepathy, near-death experiences that have sometimes occurred to atheists like you, and changed their attitudes fundamentally? All these prophets, sometimes their time interval was such that they did not have the slightest synchronicity. Which appears in the case of the Prophet of Islam 600 years after Jesus Christ (pbuh). Create the possibility in your mind, that besides nature, other factors are also influential in this life. It does not take much effort to do research, just do a little internet search, you will find out what a big mistake you made.
He may say that we have nothing to do with religion, and we do scientific work. The answer is that you are proposing a theory whose principle is based on error, and whether you like it or not, it will fail, and all your efforts will be wasted. And the second issue is our moral responsibility to those whom we have misled.
